Background Despite the lack of scientific data, many cancer patients hold

Background Despite the lack of scientific data, many cancer patients hold the belief that glucose feeds cancer and might affect disease outcome. patients. Results Study cohorts included 7,916 individuals with incident cancers and concurrent diabetes. There was no association between HbA1C levels and overall survival in colorectal (HR 1.00, 95%CI 0.95-1.06), breast (HR 1.03, 95%CI 0.95-1.11), bladder (HR 0.94, 95%CI 0.86-1.01), pancreatic (HR 0.98, 95%CI 0.94-1.02), or prostate (HR 1.02, 95%CI 0.96-1.08) cancers. Among diabetes patients treated with insulin, there was increased survival with increasing serum glucose, most prominent for bladder cancer (HRs 0.91, 95%CI 0.84-0.99, per 1 mmol/L increase). Conclusions Higher glucose and HbA1C levels in diabetes patients with incident cancer are not associated with worse overall survival following cancer diagnosis. Among insulin-treated patients, higher glucose levels may be associated with improved 125316-60-1 supplier survival. Keywords: glucose, HbA1C, diabetes, insulin, cancer, survival Introduction More than 10% of the western population above the age of 20 are diagnosed with diabetes (1). Furthermore, the lifetime risk of cancer in this population ranges from 35% to more than 50% (2). Several studies have shown associations between type 2 diabetes and elevated risk of colorectal, breast, endometrial, bladder, pancreatic, and hepatobiliary malignancies (3-7), in contrast to lower risk of prostate cancer (8). Although bias might explain some of the associations, such as detection bias for bladder cancer (9) or reverse causality for pancreatic cancer, several large meta-analyses support the reproducibility of these observations (10,11). Additional studies showed higher mortality from colorectal (12,13), and breast cancers (14) among patients with diabetes, however the results were inconclusive and might not reflect cancer-specific mortality but rather mortality secondary to comorbidities associated with the metabolic syndrome (i.e. coronary artery disease), administration of less aggressive cancer treatment or difference in response to therapy in patients with diabetes (14-18). The biological mechanisms underlying the association between diabetes and cancer are not clear. Cancers and diabetes share several common risk factors such as age, sex, obesity and a sedentary lifestyle. Chronic hyperinsulinemia, both endogenous secondary to insulin resistance and exogenous as part of therapy in patients with diabetes, was shown to have proliferative effects that can promote cancer formation through activation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) receptors Rabbit polyclonal to HERC4 (19-22). Finally, the direct effect of hyperglycemia, independent of insulin, was suggested to increase cancer risk and promote cancer growth, mainly due to cancer dependence on aerobic glycolysis for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) generation (known as the Warburg effect) (23,24). Several studies investigated the association between serum glucose and HbA1C levels 125316-60-1 supplier with the risk of cancer and precancerous lesions, both in the general as well as in the diabetic population, with conflicting results (25-27). To date, only a few studies have evaluated the effect of glucose levels on cancer outcome (28-30). Those studies did not adjust for specific cancer risk factors or variables associated with the metabolic syndrome (such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia); focused on individuals without diabetes; did not evaluate the effect of anti-diabetes medications; and did not measure glucose at the time of cancer diagnosis. In addition, some of those studies analyzed mortality from all cancers combined instead of mortality from specific cancers. Thus, it is uncertain if glucose 125316-60-1 supplier levels are associated with survival among patients with any or all cancers. Despite the lack of scientific data, many patient with cancer 125316-60-1 supplier hold the belief that glucose feeds cancer and thus might affect disease outcome. As a consequence, many patients adopt extreme diets that influence both caloric intake during treatments as well as quality of life. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the association between glucose, HbA1C levels and overall survival in patients with diabetes and incident cancer using a large population-representative database with comprehensive and high quality clinical data. This association is of importance not only for understanding the effect of glucose on tumor biology but also for the clinical management of these patients, primarily whether it is beneficial to achieve tight glycemic control in this population. Methods Five retrospective cohort studies were conducted to evaluate the association between glycemic control and outcome of diabetes-associated cancers, including colorectal, breast, bladder and pancreatic cancers that are known to have a positive association with diabetes and prostate cancer that is known to have an inverse association with diabetes. Data Source The study used data from The Health Improvement Network (THIN), a large primary care electronic medical record database from the United Kingdom (UK) (http://www.csdmruk.imshealth.com/). THIN contains information of over 11 million individuals, more than 5% of the UK.