The fibroblast growth factor/fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGF/FGFR) signaling pathway plays crucial roles in cell proliferation, angiogenesis, migration, and survival. successfully identified, which provide new chemical starting points for further structural optimization of FGFR1 inhibitors. tools for activity prediction. Pharmacophore and QSAR model have become important tools in computer-aided drug design such as virtual screening and lead optimization. In this study, we focus on a new combinatorial 3D-QSAR model for activity prediction. A pharmacophore model can be built either in a (target-) structure-based manner or a ligand-based manner. Structure-based pharmacophore is based on the apo protein structure or protein-ligand complex, which needs to analyze the complementary chemical features of activities site and their spatial relationships, and then to build pharmacophore assembly with selected features. The limitation of this kind of model is that too many chemical features can be identified to apply for practical applications. Additionally, it cannot reflect the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) as it just considers a single SPRY4 target or a single target-ligand complex . Compared with structure-based model, ligand-based pharmacophore is more frequently used, which extracts common chemical features from aligned compound structures interacting with the same target, based on the hypothesis that compounds interacting with the same protein target may share similar chemical structure and physicochemical properties [18,19]. The pivotal issues of the ligand-based model are the modeling of ligand flexibility, the alignment methods of molecules and the selection of training set. Different pharmacophore models could be derived from different training sets because it is easily affected by the type of the ligand, the site of the dataset and chemical diversity . QSAR model, which quantifies the correlation between structures of a series of compounds and biological activities, is based on the hypothesis that compounds with similar structures or physiochemical properties have similar activities . The development of a QSAR model involves a series of consecutive steps, including: (1) Collect ligands with known activity with the same target; (2) Extract descriptors representing the molecule; (3) Select best descriptors from a larger set of descriptors; (4) Map the molecular descriptors into the biological activity; and (5) Internal and external validation of the QSAR model . Compared with classical QSAR method using fragment-based descriptors such as electronic, hydrophobic and steric features, 3D-QSAR model is based on 3D descriptors such as various geometric, physical characteristics and quantum chemical descriptors, which are useful in describing the ligand-receptor interactions . Statistical tools 867160-71-2 supplier such 867160-71-2 supplier as multivariable linear regression analysis (MLR), principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least square analysis (PLS) can be used for linear QSAR modeling, while there are also many nonlinear models established using neural network, Bayesian neural network and others machine learning techniques. To validate the QSAR model, internal cross validation is used and to calculate the cross validated and stability. is the ratio of model variance to the observed activity variance and a larger indicates a more statistically significant regression. is significance level of variance ratio and smaller values represent a greater degree of confidence. Stability value reflects the stability of the model predictions with changes in the training set composition. Therefore, an ideal QSAR model should have large and large stability. Table 1 lists statistic parameters of the combinatorial QSAR model. The predicted activity generated by the combinatorial 3D-QSAR model of (A) the training set and (B) the test set. Table 2 Prediction performance of single QSAR model and combinatorial QSAR model on test set.  reported that a substitution of electron-withdrawing groups on the phenyl ring of the oxindole can improve the inhibitory activity, which is consistent with the conclusion that the domain b has a positive contribution for maintaining the activity. Open in a separate window Figure 4 The QSAR model visualized in the context of the most active (A); moderately active (B,C); and the least active (D) molecules in training set. A decoy set of 7897 compounds including 232 inhibitors was used to further evaluate the ability of this combinatorial model to identify actives from a relatively large dataset. As shown in Table 3, the maximum values of all groups appear at 1%C2%, meaning that 867160-71-2 supplier when we screen the database, true positive compounds can be efficiently recognized among the top ranked compounds. Figure 5 shows the curve of the combinatorial QSAR model against the whole decoy dataset. The curve shows a peak when the percent of database screened is less than 5%, illustrating that our model is suitable for screening potential actives from a large database. Table 3 Enrichment factor (curve of the whole decoys database. One application.